Grade 5: Bubblology

Rating:

5 apple rating

http://achievethecore.org/page/864/bubblology-mini-assessment

COMMON CORE STANDARDS

Reading Informational Text

RI.5.1 Quote accurately from a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text.

RI.5.2 Determine two or more main ideas of a text and explain how they are supported by key details; summarize the text.

RI.5.3 Explain the relationships or interactions between two or more individuals, events, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text based on specific information in the text.

RI.5.4 Determine the meaning of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases in a text relevant to a grade 5 topic or subject area.

RI.5.6 Analyze multiple accounts of the same event or topic, noting important similarities and differences in the point of view they represent.

RI.5.8 Explain how an author uses reasons and evidence to support particular points in a text, identifying which reasons and evidence support which point(s).

Writing

W.5.2 Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas and information clearly.

W.5.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.

DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT

This grade 5 mini-assessment titled “Bubblology” is cited on achievethecore.org. It is based on a passage from a text that is intended to inform instruction about a student’s ability to engage in the close reading of complex informational text in order to demonstrate deep understanding. There are seven text-dependent questions that address the Reading Standards listed above. There is also an optional constructed-response item, which is aligned to the Reading, Writing, and Language Standards. The writing prompt requires students to write an informative/explanatory essay based on information from the text.

CAUTIONS

This mini-assessment is designed to be completed in one class period; however, educators are encouraged to allow students additional time as necessary to read closely, answer the questions, and write to the source. It is strongly recommended that the writing prompt not be optional.

RATIONALE FOR SELECTION

This mini-assessment is an exemplary example of how to design text-dependent questions aligned to specific Common Core Standards. It could be used as a formative assessment at the start of a school year and/or to assess the growth in students’ abilities to engage in the close reading of a complex text. An annotated Teacher’s Guide for the assessment gives specific rationale for each answer option and lists which standards it addresses. There is an aligned rubric for the writing prompt as well as assessment guidelines. Information about determining text complexity (quantitative and qualitative data) is included with assessment materials.